Network Security Through the Eyes of a 'Cable Guy'

News Flash! The world of the traditional cable service provider is changing...

Written by CCI Solutions Director, Drew Kempen

We all know about how consumers are consuming video via streaming; about the growth of DOCSIS and Internet services; about how the Internet of Things (IoT) is bringing massive amounts of new devices into the network; and about how almost everything we do as a consumer continues to migrate to the ‘cloud’. In short, everything is moving to ‘IP’. 

Unfortunately, growing the capacity and speed of the network isn’t the only area of concern that comes with this change. With IP, network security becomes a huge concern. Oftentimes, security of the headend-to-consumer pipeline has been overlooked in the traditional cable service provider environment. It is also not the sort of cost that many traditional service providers are used to stomaching. So how does someone who is not a security expert, or even an IP expert, wrap their heads around security? And how can you justify requesting funds to spend on security?

Why does my system need security?

There are a number of reasons operators need to begin to take security seriously. The most overt and publically familiar concern is being maliciously hacked. This is when hackers are accessing[G1]  your network or subscribers off your network to gather personal information, business data, insert malware, or hold you digitally hostage. We all hear the horror stories of companies being hacked, identity theft, computers being taken over, networks crashing, and so on.

CCI’s Security Solutions Director, Andy Erickson, points out “Ransomware has become the malware of choice for many hackers.” Ransomware is on its way to becoming a $1 billion market (Taylor, 2016).  This issue is not getting better, it is getting worse. Yet we still see many operators continuing to play Russian roulette by putting off investing in security solutions.

Click to Watch: Ransomware- The Anatomy of an Attack (Cisco on YouTube.com)

Second, attacks are happening all of the time. No unprotected network is safe. Every operator experiences these attacks and most don’t know they are happening at all. Imagine running a large business with hundreds of employees, products, revenue streams and costs. Now imagine the only report you get is dollars in and dollars out. Basically, you know how much money you are making. How easy would it be to hide fraud, wasted dollars, and identify critical aspects that allow you to know how each product and employee are performing? Network security today is like that. Your IP bandwidth is that business, and everything is hiding in the IP packets. It could be legitimate traffic, it could be malicious traffic, or it could be useless or DDoS generated traffic. You only see how much traffic is used. 

Examine the large DDoS attacks we have seen in the news lately about services such as Amazon, Netflix, and so on being taken down. These are not shut down by someone from Russia hacking their sites. The hackers hack entire groups of IP devices in people’s homes and program them to request access to an IP address all at one time. Take the massive outage that occurred late last year that affected the east coast of the United States. This was a DDoS attack against Dyn where the attackers used IoT devices to effect and attack (Newman, 2016). We are talking about refrigerators, watches, phones, tablets, thermostats, etc. This happens all the time and will happen with more frequency as more and more devices come online and are unprotected. 

How do I justify the cost?

Investing in security is not as unfamiliar to cable operators as many may think it is. Consider video encryption requirements and the challenges the presented for the entire industry from both a technical and financial aspect. This was to secure the content. This introduced millions of dollars of cost to operators simply to meet requirements. Today, security is different and more complex.  However, unlike the investment in encryption, these security technologies offer the opportunity for new and next-generation revenue generating services. 

For the sake of an example, let’s assume that when your traffic is at peak burst time, that 20-25% of that actually turns out to be malicious or attack oriented bursts. You provision your entire network because of peak time traffic usage. For a cable/DOCSIS operator, that is the difference between 16 and 20 DOCSIS QAM or 24 and 32 QAM. Without visibility into this traffic, huge amounts of money may be being spent to scale a network faster than it needs to be scaled. At first glance, these percentages seem high but look no further than last January’s Arbor DDoS report that clocked the largest ever DDoS attack at 500 Gbps[G2]  (Ungureanu, 2016).  Many respondents to the report saw an over 100 Gbps[G3]  attack during the year. Again, this problem isn't getting better, it is getting worse. As more and more devices come online, this percentage will inevitably rise. Now is the time to gain visibility into this and implement solutions to stop that traffic. [G4] [G5] 

Potential Monetization

There is also a value to the consumer. Next-generation firewalls provide a huge security benefit. Coming from a cable guy, using the term ‘firewall’ for this solution is very misleading. When most people think of firewall, they think of some mass marketed software that everyone has tried, yet we always seem to get viruses on our devices one way or another. Unfortunately, this has been the only layer of security most consumers have ever had. These next-gen network firewalls actually provide many of the benefits of a desktop security solution and more. Not that you would recommend not having desktop security on a computer, but Anti-Malware detection for the entire home is part of these network firewalls. It provides an additional layer of security for the entire IP stream to that home. 

Deep packet inspection is also a key feature of these network firewalls. Malicious programs and code are hidden within the IP packets. Unless you unwrap and analyze the contents of these packets, you will not be able to find the illegitimate source code. Next-generation firewalls provide this capability which helps protect your network and your subscribers. It is important to remember that as consumers information and data continue to migrate to the digital realm, it is not just data that needs to be secured, it is their life, intimate information, and identities. 

These values can translate into and additional revenue generating service to subscribers both commercial and residential. For example, let’s assume you have a 100 MB data tier. 

Option 1:

100 MBPS Class of service- Unlimited Data = $79.99/mo

Option 2:

100 MBPS Class of service- Unlimited Data= Whole home network security, firewall, malware protection, virus prevention, all-device protection = $89.99/mo

You could throw in an option 3 ‘business class’ that offers DDoS protection as well. The primary point is that you now have the capability to realize an additional revenue stream for an area of growing importance and relevance for your subscriber base. This is valuable especially considering the shrinking revenue and income generated by traditional video.

From a solution standpoint, there are many layers of security to be considered. For example, there are network-wide options that also help with the problems, such as Cisco Umbrella (OpenDNS) and Arbor DDoS detection, and mitigation solutions. 

CCI Systems CTO Matt Reath comments regarding the value of this solution; “In this case, a service provider can setup up their network and subscribers to utilize the open DNS solution so that DNS requests are scrubbed and requests protected. Arbor looks at all packets going in and out of the network and alerts and reacts to DDoS attacks. This combined with proper end-user education and in-home firewall systems creates a multi-layered approach to security.” This multi-layered approach is critical to offering a comprehensive solution for security. 

CCI’s Security Solutions Director, Andy Erickson proposes; “From a Service Provider’s perspective, security can be implemented in a phased approach:  crawl, walk, run.  Next-generation firewalls with Cisco’s Umbrella is a great starting point and can be the foundational framework for your security to build from.” In conjunction with this solution approach, CCI offers security consulting in a crawl, walk, run method. This starts with providing visibility into network attacks that are happening and security threat assessments of the current network. 

Summary

Network security should not be looked at as optional or as an ‘insurance policy’ any longer. It should be a requirement for the foundation of any long-term strategy. How many operators sink millions of dollars to make the physical layer redundant? Fiber links, line cards, switches, etc., all to increase reliability and minimize downtime. It’s time we all start understanding the preventative nature and benefits of enhanced network security solutions, as well as the asset they are to our systems and services we can offer to our subscribers.

For more information or to discuss your network’s security strategy, reach out to CCI on social media or contact us at info@ccisystems.com.

Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn

References

Taylor, H. (2016) Ransomware Spiked 6,000% in 2016 and Most Victims Paid the Hackers, IBM finds. Retrieved February 7, 2016 from www.cnbc.com
Newman, L. H. (2016) What we know about Friday’s Massive East Coast Internet Outage. Retrieved February 7, 2017 from www.wired.com.
Ungureanu, H. (2016) Worlds Largest DDoS Attacks Breaks Records, Clocks at Massive 500 gbps. Retrieved February 7, 2017 from www.techtimes.com.

CES 2017 Recap: From a Service Provider Perspective

Written by CSE,  Drew Kempen

The Relevance of CES

In order for any business to thrive and grow, it must be able to adapt and plan for changes in the market space. What is changing? When will it change? How will we make that change? What are the options? How much will it cost? Attempting to answer these questions requires a large dose of prognostication. CES is one of the best windows into the future that the service provider industry has. CES is effective because it focuses on the consumer; what they will be using and how they will be using it. This drives the migration of services that are important to consumers, thus driving network changes.

With a tagline of ‘WHOA’, CES 2017 seemed to come up short of anything mind-blowing this year. CES 2017 was essentially 2016 v1.1. We saw primarily the same technologies, slightly more refined. This is an encouraging trend for service providers. For a number of years, there has been much change and uncertainty about which directions both consumers and manufacturers would grow. We are now seeing a more stable and focused technology wave.

Last year, 4K and Virtual Reality (VR) were all the rage. This year, we had a few slight modifications to that. Almost every booth in 2016 had some version of 4k playing video in their booth, regardless of the products they were touting. This year, almost every booth had a VR experience. Also, rather than 4k being highlighted; it was HDR technology that took center stage.

All Things IP

Last year we saw an explosion of new connected devices and concepts. Very few ‘new’ ideas were demonstrated this year, however, there was a strong focus on refining these products. From Streaming boxes to VR to wearables; the focus was on better performance, better design, and more functionality. This stronger focus on technologies allow us to get a clearer picture of where services are going, thus defining which direction our network needs to grow.

4K, HDR and VR will continue to drive the next video transition. However, this transition also comes along with a migration of this video content to all IP. While video is alive and well, it is clear that traditional forms of video services are fading. Consumers are becoming more and more accustomed to on-demand, no/minimal commercial, and a seamless/mobile viewing experience. The crux of future video uncertainty currently rests with the content providers and networks. What will they do with broadcast, commercials, re-transmission rights, bundle requirements, and contract negotiations? With a-la-carte channels, skinny bundles, and quality original programming from OTT players such as Netflix and Amazon Prime; consumers continue to take back power from the networks. No one yet knows how or if they will adapt.

In the meantime, it is the OTT and direct to consumer streaming apps that are taking the lead with 4k, HDR and VR services. True 4K and HDR undoubtedly offer a mesmerizing large screen experience. Just as the theater experience continues to attract 10’s of millions of customers keeping the theater industry relevant, 4k and HDR can do that for the living room experience. As we see the OLED paper-thin televisions develop, it validates that the large screen experience is here for the long-haul.
OLED is Awesome

The thin OLED televisions were arguably the coolest piece of technology at the show. The current generation of LG W OLED TV’s are less than 4mm thick. The newest advancement which wasn’t shown at the show is less than 1mm thick, and can be rolled like a newspaper! It is not difficult to envision an entire wall of the living room becoming an OLED TV in the future essentially making your wall an IMAX theater. Looking even further out into the future, one could certainly see an entire room dedicated to 360 degree OLED essentially giving you a headset free VR experience.

VR Continues to Impress

VR once again took center stage at this show. The reason this is so interesting is that VR is truly in its infancy. In many ways, VR is currently a parlor trick. When you put on the headset, it quickly becomes immersive, fascinating and addictive. However, when you think about it in the real world, it still has a long way to go. The content is minimal, functionality is crude, and video quality is extremely poor. Yet it still is growing in use at a rapid pace. One can only imagine how more effective and desirable this service will be when it is refined and in a true HD format.

All this means one thing for service providers. The pipeline will always be growing and growing fast. Historically, a 50% CAGR for data usage has been seen. There is certainly no reason to think this will slow down and could very well me more than this for the next few years as these technology and service transitions mature.

While there are certainly challenges to service providers in continuing to grow the network, the growing requirements of large bandwidth streams and services presents a significant opportunity and welcome trend. It keeps their hardline service relevant and required to the home, potentially staving off the next generation of LTE capabilities as a peer competitor.
Virtual Traffic Jam

Finally, service providers must consider the implications of the combination of exploding wi-fi connected devices within the home, mobile streaming devices and TV’s, and the large stream rate requirements of 4k, HDR, and VR. This presents a huge wi-fi, network management, and security issue within the home. It also presents so a growing opportunity and market for new revenue-generating services of which the service provider is in an ideal situation to provide. A number of vendors were showcasing new wi-fi management platforms that provide visibility to the in-home network and devices. While these are almost all in their first software generation of functionality, the platforms provide the capabilities required to help service providers delve into these abilities today, while providing the scalability to increase capabilities and functionality with software upgrades.

Summary: Future-world

For those of us who grew up in the 70’s and 80’s, by now we should be playing in holo-decks, visiting the moon, speaking some version of pseudo English-Chinese, and flying around rather than driving. In reality, the next-generation future world lies before us. Self-driving connected cars before flying, VR before holo-decks, and obviously google translate is the mechanism that will facilitate the English-Chinese language transition. Every device, application, and execution of what we do in life is becoming connected and part of the way we live. There are few things that slam this reality into mind than your child wondering why a hotel remote has so many buttons and doesn’t know why you can’t speak to the remote. It’s no wonder the generation of knob-turners didn’t make the transition to flying cars and the moon. Perhaps our current generation of ‘remote control talkers’ will take us there. 

Stay in touch with Drew on Twitter at @DrewKempen

The Benefits of DOCSIS 3.1

Author: Drew Kempen, Consulting Systems Engineer

DOCSIS 3.1 has finally arrived! After years of talk and development, we are finally beginning to see the initial roll-outs of this next-generation technology. A few years have passed since the benefits of DOCSIS 3.1 were touted. 

Are those benefits still relevant today? It's worth revisiting.

In order to fully understand the benefits of DOCSIS 3.1, it is necessary to understand the boundaries of DOCSIS 3.0. DOCSIS 3.0 was a transformational technology in its own right and time. It provides the capacity to provide up to 1 GB of data to a service group, the ability to offer a high class of service, and provides many features and functionality that help operators with managing the customer, reporting, and reliability. 

Over time, the strengths of DOCSIS 3.0 become its weakness. The ability to achieve 1 GB downstream with up to 32 QAM becomes a limitation. Long-term bandwidth projections predict that DOCSIS 3.0 will begin to reach maximum capacities as soon as 2019 (without continuing to scale down service group sizes). In addition, competition driving 1 GB classes of service has accelerated the need for something beyond DOCSIS 3.0. The once high service group capacities of 3.0 platforms are now no longer enough. As service groups migrate to smaller and smaller groups of homes passed to manage bandwidth availability, more and more ports are required. The continual scaling of chassis, optics and other equipment to accommodate this growth becomes unsustainable. 

To put this scale into perspective, some operators have said they will need to split nodes from 4 to 10x what they are today over the next 10 years. And this is with the full capacity used on 3.0 chassis. The result would be 10x the CMTS chassis, 10x the optics, and 10x the nodes. Facilities, rack space and power requirements cannot scale with this growth. 

For a time, these inevitabilities were pushing many operators to consider a wholesale infrastructure transition to FTTH and PON technologies. The challenge with this was the complete overhaul of the entire network from video, to data provisioning, to OSP cabling and equipment to CPE. The cost, technology and knowledge change and disruption to the customers (and roadsides) made this a very unattractive option.

Enter DOCSIS 3.1. The first problem solved is the 32 channel limitation. DOCSIS 3.1 provides the ability to bond much larger groups of spectrum together to provide a true 1 GB Class of service and beyond. This also assists in the scaling problem. Whereas before, node segmentation would often be required when groups meet the 32 QAM limitation; the ability to use the full spectrum for data removes that requirement. 

DOCSIS 3.1 also allows for enhanced spectral efficiency. For math purposes, consider that a 3.0 256 QAM channel provides approximately 40 MB of throughput. DOCSIS 3.1 uses Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) technology that allows QAM modulations to reach 1, 2, 4k and beyond. A 1k QAM provides approximately 50 MB of throughput or a 25% increase in the same amount of spectrum. When you combine this capability with distributed access architectures (DAA), we see added improvement resulting in 4k QAM modulation and beyond. Therefore, DOCSIS 3.1 provides the bandwidth with more ‘bang for its buck’. 

High level-comparison features and capabilities of Next-Gen 3.1 platforms vs legacy 3.0. *Numbers may vary slightly by vendor chassis

Originally, the new DOCSIS 3.1 and DAA technologies were designed with smaller and smaller cascades in mind. However, testing has shown that improvements can be made over some of the longer cascades that exist today. For example, it is possible to achieve 1024 QAM where 256 QAM currently exists. This improved performance continues to increase as you get down to smaller and smaller cascades. 

Addressing the Upstream

As data rates increase, the upstream continues to become more and more of a choke point. Studies suggest that the upstream capacity should be 10% of the highest class of service offered. For example, for a 1 GB service to be fully functional, approximately ~100MB of upstream throughput is required. As larger and larger data pipes are brought to each service group, the upstream limits will be pushed. DOCSIS 3.0 allows for a 5-85 upstream, allowing room for growth to handle this change. DOCSIS 3.1 pushes the split to 5-200 which allows for HFC systems to theoretically achieve a GB symmetrical service. 

The Importance of DAA 

DAA architectures such as Remote Phy or Remote Mac/Phy are inseparable from DOCSIS 3.1 when discussing the benefits next-gen DOCSIS platforms. While 3.1 chassis do traditionally offer a higher amount of port density in a chassis, this still becomes a limitation of the box. The next generation of CCAP platforms have more throughput potential than the physical RF output limitations can take advantage of. DAA becomes extremely valuable in that it removes that limitation by providing a digital link to the node itself, eliminating the limitation of physical RF ports. This also provides better link performance which continues to compliment the ability to achieve higher orders of modulation (better throughput performance across the same amount of spectrum). 

Improvement in MB throughput of spectrum by leveraging higher orders of modulation made possible by DOCSIS 3.1 and DAA. 

Perhaps the greatest benefit of DOCSIS 3.1 is that it dramatically extends the life of the HFC network and physical architecture. By extending the life of the physical infrastructure, it extends the life of all the assets of the network—from the video platform, existing CMTS chassis and provisioning systems, optical infrastructure, OSP, and CPE. 

The new urgency of a long-term plan

DOCSIS 3.1 in many ways did swoop in and save the day, but it also brings to light a flaw and errors that cannot be made again. For nearly a decade, many cable operators got trapped in operational mode without a long-term strategy. Had 3.1 not come along, the push to get to FTTH would be exploding at a rate that the supply cannot provide. 3.1 has brought new life to existing infrastructure and has allowed for a more graceful migration to fiber deep, higher bandwidth capacities, system upgrades, service migration and virtualization. All of these solutions need to be executed with an eye on the longer term future, to ensure that the things we do today compliment the needs of tomorrow instead of simply extending the limits of the past.

Market Demand Determines Network Technologies

Why the ‘Cable’ Market is Primed for Opportunity

Author: Drew Kempen, Consulting Systems Engineer

Drew Kempen, CSE

Seemingly overnight, there is a major buzz around the cable market.  What is causing this buzz in a technology area that was apparently in serious peril not too long ago?  To understand this, one must understand cable history, the overall market and technology. 

Cable had seen arguably its largest growth period in the late 90’s to mid-2000s. The introduction of two-way internet capable systems in 1996, along with the demand and transition to HD content in the 2000s sparked this growth.  A massive undertaking of pushing fiber deep, building next gen architectures (anything less than N+6), and expanding bandwidth drove the network adaptation.  

Subscribers, all of the sudden, were being thrust into the digital age.  Analog began its slow death—but still played a part as a service.  HD content slowly became the primary customer choice and major differentiator.  Cable could offer much better speeds than the previous dial-up and DSL models.  The future looked bright.  

To account for growth in HSD/Data demand, cable introduced DOCSIS 3.0. This allowed for more than one channel per service group to be bonded together— offering a larger pipe and keeping service group sizes larger.  Most cable operators then sat back, made the necessary changes, went into operational mode, and watched customers roll in.  

But as with any technology industry, ‘promising futures’ arrive and are surpassed very quickly…

Fast forward to 2007 and the financial crisis.  The market crash hit technology and cable operators particularly hard.  Virtually everything regarding investment into the system was put on hold.  The ‘necessity’ to grow HD content from 200 channels to 300 channels began to seem…ridiculous.  The seemingly infinite amount of new channels popping up daily during the HD era disappeared overnight.  Cable went into a defensive mode.  Maintain and recoup.  Innovation stopped, plant investment halted, and growth became stagnant. 

This in turn affected the equipment and partner side.  Vendors scaled back on the big bet investments and R&D.  Contractors slowly disappeared.  As in any economic downturn, only the strong survived.  This trend also applied to cable operators as consolidations of many of the mid to smaller tier companies occurred.  

Then in 2008, everything changed once again, and would never be the same.  Netflix began streaming in November of 2008.  While there were sceptics because of the limited content at the time, Netflix became an instant success.  Particularly for people on a budget.  By this time, internet connectivity had finally overtaken video as the most important communication service required in the home.  Many people in the down economy had to pay for internet, but didn’t want to fork over the extra $50-100 per month for video.  Netflix provided a revolutionary and cost saving idea, and gave subscribers an experience better than anything they ever had in the past.  

It is very important to understand that up to this time, from the introduction of cable internet, one DOCSIS QAM channel per service group had sufficiently accounted for data traffic. Within 2-3 years, Netflix alone accounted for 50% or more of all internet traffic.  The revolution had begun.  Steadily, we began to see the demand for DOCSIS QAM per service group rise from 1-2 by 2010, 2-4 by 2013, 4-8 by 2015, etc.  Now the industry is looking at 32 channels and beyond over the next few years alone, and with smaller and smaller service group sizes.

 

Chart: DOCSIS QAM Growth Trends & Projections for constant service group size.

In addition to Netflix and streaming services, FTTx began to heavily roll out in the 2010s.  The ‘speed war’ had begun.  30 MB, 50 MB, 100 MB, 300 MB, 1 GB tiers!  Not only was keeping up with real customer demands a concern, but now a marketing war based on subscriber perception had begun.  

The problem many cable operators faced, was that cable technology at the time, would not be able to keep up with those speed requirements.  It was also apparent as they viewed the demand/impact hockey stick of QAM channel requirements, they were going to have significant issues keeping up with consumer demand—unless they continued to split nodes; over and over and over again.  This would cause rapid expansion in CMTS chassis requirements, optics, fiber, nodes, etc.  Not a viable option for any long term strategy or business model.

Major MSOs began to question whether they should abandon growing HFC at all and move directly to a FTTH architecture.  There seemed to be no good answer.  Moving to a FTTH architecture was a massive cost, change in technology, new HE’s, changing set-tops, re-educating maintenance crews, changing operating procedures, …new vendors, partners, contractors, etc.  In addition, the transitional process would be a nightmare.  On the flip side, investing in HFC to keep up with demand and competition appeared okay for a while; but seemed a lost cause in the long run. 

Fortunately, the few remaining thought leaders in the industry came together.  The result of this is DOCSIS 3.1, higher density chassis, remote Phy, 1.2 GHz gear, larger US splits, etc.  The foundations of this all arising in the 2012-2014 time frames.  The possibilities that these technologies would provide, modeled cable systems well beyond a 10-year time frame at a fraction of the cost of a full FTTx overbuild.  Adopting a hybrid New Next Gen HFC architecture with targeted PON not only extends that even further, but helps the longer term migration to fiber deeper becomes manageable and cost effective. 

These technologies help solve the bandwidth issue, speed requirements, scaling issue at the HE, and provide spectrum for next gen services such as managed IP, Cloud VOD, Cloud DVR, etc.   At this point, it was all a matter of the vendors and partners executing on that solution, equipment and software.  

Opportunities in Cable are back, and in a big way.  Major players in cable such as Comcast and Time Warner continuing to investment in HFC technologies.  These changes include Node splits, upgrades, CMTS replacement and scaling, D3.1, Remote Phy, IP video, Targeted PON growth, new build PON integration, etc.  

Over the next 10 years, the majority of cable operators will have:

• Upgraded most if not all of their node and active components
• Enhanced tap and passive networks
• Migrated to node only
• Growing CMTS capacity multiple times over
• Introduced DOCSIS 3.1 and Remote Phy
• Migrated services away from broadcast and traditional QAM to IP delivered services
• Migrated portions of their network to true virtualization
• Began process of migrating to full FTTX/PON

Vendors will be releasing new platforms and technologies at a rapid pace over the next few years.  The scale of changes in the network will rival, if not exceed the changes that took place in the late 90s to mid-2000s.  To achieve success during this transition, operators, vendors and partners need to work together—leveraging the strengths of each entity.  

CCI has the ‘across the network’ experience and expertise to help cable operators build a strategic migration solution for both the physical network and service strategy.  From strategy to design, installation, implementation, and Managed NOC & Call Center services, CCI is the ideal partner to help cable operators with transitioning their traditional video and HFC systems to the IP capable network of the future.

CCI Systems Adds Drew Kempen to Technology Team

Consulting Systems Engineer brings extensive cable architecture knowledge to CCI

  

Drew Kempen, CSE 

IRON MOUNTAIN, Mich., September 21, 2015- CCI Systems recently announced technology expert, Drew Kempen, has joined the team to offer additional expertise with HFC and FTTx end-to-end architecture, solution and consulting services.

“Drew’s years of experience, business acumen, and technical vision are vital components to providing thought leadership to our customers and guiding them to success,” said CCI CTO, Matt Reath.

As Cable Architecture and Strategy CSE, Kempen will play a role in developing and implementing CCI’s cable strategy, with emphasis on Tier 2-4 service providers (SP). He has worked with cable operators around the world in developing a planned strategy that migrates the network based on customer and service requirements. This includes technology, service and architecture migrations that help operators effectively transition toward a Next-Gen IP video platform. His specializations include solution architecture, service and bandwidth modeling and migration, service & technology transition strategy, cost analysis and construction/operational impact analysis, with experience in developing Optical, HFC, X-PON and FTTx solutions.

"CCI has been doing great things for services provider networks for a long time. Customers know they can come to CCI to get the job done right.” Kempen noted. “The cable operator market is about to go through a major transformation which presents an enormous opportunity for CCI. I am excited to help CCI become not only a leader in implementation, but a thought leader in the industry, where customers come to CCI to figure out ‘what to do’. As we engage customers at the strategic level on developing solutions and a long term plan, the value of CCI to the customer will vault to the top of the value pyramid; and will entrench us as a partner and solution provider to the customer for years to come.”

Kempen joins CCI after 16 years with Cisco as an Architecture Specialist and Consultant, where he worked with customers at the operational layer, as well as the strategic level, giving him a unique perspective and understanding of the requirements cable operators have when looking for solutions.

While holding a Bachelor’s degree in Business Science and Management, Kempen has also earned multiple Cisco certifications, including Cisco Certified PM, Cisco certification in networking and the Advanced Sales Masters Certification. 

Stop by and say hello to Drew at the upcoming SCTE Cable Tec Expo. CCI will be in booth #2721 and will be  available to have candid planning discussions with Service Providers regarding present and future network needs.